Efficacy and safety of a structured de-escalation from antipseudomonal ß-lactams in bloodstream infections due to Enterobacterales (SIMPLIFY): an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: De-escalation from broad-spectrum to narrow-spectrum antibiotics is considered an important measure to reduce the selective pressure of antibiotics, but a scarcity of adequate evidence is a barrier to its implementation. We aimed to determine whether de-escalation from an antipseudomonal ß-lactam to a narrower-spectrum drug was non-inferior to continuing the antipseudomonal drug in patients with Enterobacterales bacteraemia. METHODS: An open-label, pragmatic, randomised trial was performed in 21 Spanish hospitals. Patients with bacteraemia caused by Enterobacterales susceptible to one of the de-escalation options and treated empirically with an antipseudomonal ß-lactam were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by urinary source) to de-escalate to ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (urinary tract infections only), cefuroxime, cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, or ertapenem in that order according to susceptibility (de-escalation group), or to continue with the empiric antipseudomonal ß-lactam (control group). Oral switching was allowed in both groups. The primary outcome was clinical cure 3-5 days after end of treatment in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, formed of patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety was assessed in all participants. Non-inferiority was declared when the lower bound of the 95% CI of the absolute difference in cure rate was above the -10% non-inferiority margin. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2015-004219-19) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02795949) and is complete. FINDINGS: 2030 patients were screened between Oct 5, 2016, and Jan 23, 2020, of whom 171 were randomly assigned to the de-escalation group and 173 to the control group. 164 (50%) patients in the de-escalation group and 167 (50%) in the control group were included in the mITT population. 148 (90%) patients in the de-escalation group and 148 (89%) in the control group had clinical cure (risk difference 1·6 percentage points, 95% CI -5·0 to 8·2). The number of adverse events reported was 219 in the de-escalation group and 175 in the control group, of these, 53 (24%) in the de-escalation group and 56 (32%) in the control group were considered severe. Seven (5%) of 164 patients in the de-escalation group and nine (6%) of 167 patients in the control group died during the 60-day follow-up. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: De-escalation from an antipseudomonal ß-lactam in Enterobacterales bacteraemia following a predefined rule was non-inferior to continuing the empiric antipseudomonal drug. These results support de-escalation in this setting. FUNDING: Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases; Spanish Clinical Research and Clinical Trials Platform, co-financed by the EU; European Development Regional Fund "A way to achieve Europe", Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014-2020.

Efficacy and safety of different antimicrobial DURATions for the treatment of Infections associated with Osteosynthesis Material implanted after long bone fractures (DURATIOM): Protocol for a randomized, pragmatic trial.

BACKGROUND: Infection associated with osteosynthesis material (IOM) is one of the most feared and challenging complications of trauma surgery and can cause significant functional loss, requiring multiple interventions and excessive consumption of antimicrobials. Evidence is needed about the best surgical procedure and the duration of antibiotic treatment according to the age of the implant or onset of infection symptoms, as it considers the biofilm formation and the state of fracture healing. There were not clinical trials evaluating the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in IOM when implant is retained. Because there are antibiotics that have proven to be effective for the treatment of infection associated to implant, mainly in PJI, these antibiotics could be used in these infections. Investigating whether shorter duration of treatment is a priority in infectious diseases, as a way to reduce the exposure to antibiotics and help in controlling antimicrobial resistance and avoiding unnecessary adverse events and cost. We aim to describe the hypothesis, objectives, design, variables and procedures for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing different durations of antibiotic treatment in IOM after long bone fractures treated with debridement and implant retention. METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled, pragmatic phase 3 trial, comparing different durations of antibiotic treatment in IOM after long bone fractures treated with debridement and implant retention. Patients with microbiologically confirmed IOM will be included. Eligible patients are those older than 14 years, with early IOM (up to 2 weeks after the implant surgery) and delayed IOM (between 3 and 10 weeks after the implant surgery) with stabilized fracture and absence of bone exposure who sign the informed consent. Randomization will be 1:1 to receive a short-term antibiotic treatment (8 weeks in early IOM and 12 weeks in delayed IOM) or a long-term antibiotic treatment (12 weeks in early IOM or until fracture healing or implant removal in delayed IOM). The antibiotic treatment will be that used in routine practice by the specialist in infectious diseases. The primary outcome is the composited variable "cure" that includes clinical cure, radiological healing, and definitive soft tissue coverage, which will be evaluated in the test of cure at 12 months after the end of antibiotic therapy. Adverse events, resistance development during therapy and functional status will be collected. A total of 364 patients are needed to show a 10% non-inferiority margin, with 80% power and 5% one-sided significance level. DISCUSSION: If the hypothesis of non-inferiority of short vs. long antibiotic treatments is demonstrated, and the efficacy of antibiotics with less ecological impact in long treatments, the impact on reduction of bacterial resistance, toxicity and health costs will be observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05294796) on Jan 26th 2022 and at the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EUDRACT) (2021-003914-38) on Jul 16th 2021. The Sponsor Study Code is DURATIOM.

The use of ertapenem for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in routine hospital practice: a matched cohort study / Uso de ertapenem en la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad en la práctica clínica diaria: estudio de cohortes pareadas

Background. The clinical response to ertapenem in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at the setting of routine hospital practice has been scarcely evaluated. Methods. We retrospectively compared CAP cases treated with ertapenem or with other standard antimicrobials (controls) at a tertiary 1,434-bed center from 2005 to 2014. Results. Out of 6,145 patients hospitalized with CAP, 64 (1%) ertapenem-treated and 128 controls were studied (PSI IV-V 72%, mean age 73 years.). A significant higher proportion of bedridden patients (41% vs. 21%), residence in nursing homes (19% vs. 7%), previous use of antibiotics (39% vs. 29%) and necrotizing (13% vs. 1%) or complicated (36% vs. 19%) pneumonia, was observed in the ertapenem vs. non-ertapenem patients. Initial treatment with ertapenem was independently associated with an earlier resolution of signs of infection. In patients aged 65 or older the independent risks factors for mortality were: PSI score (7.0, 95%CI 1.8-27.7), bedridden status (4.6, 95%CI 1.1-20.9) and Health Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP) (4.6, 95%CI 1.3-16.5). First-line treatment with ertapenem was an independent protector factor in this subgroup of patients (0.1, 95%CI 0.1-0.7). Conclusions. Ertapenem showed a superior clinical response in frail elderly patients with complicated community- acquired pneumonia, and it may be considered as a firstline therapeutic regimen in this setting (AU)

Introducción. La respuesta clínica a ertapenem en la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) en el contexto de la práctica clínica diaria ha sido evaluada de forma insuficiente. Material y Métodos. Estudio retrospectivo, comparativo de pacientes con NAC tratados con ertapenem o con otros antimicrobianos en un hospital terciario de 1.434 camas en el período 2005-2014. Resultados. De los 6.145 pacientes hospitalizados con NAC, 64 (1%) tratados con ertapenem y 128 controles fueron incluidos en el estudio (PSI IV-V 72%, edad media 73 años). Se observó una proporción significativamente mayor de pacientes encamados (41% vs. 21%), institucionalizados (19% vs. 7%), con antibioterapia previa (39% vs. 29%) y con neumonías necrotizantes (13% vs. 1%) o complicadas (36% vs. 19%) en el grupo de ertapenem vs. no-ertapenem. El tratamiento inicial con ertapenem se asoció de forma independiente con una resolución más temprana de los signos de infección. En el subgrupo de pacientes con 65 años o más, los factores independientes de riesgo de mortalidad fueron: PSI score (7,0 IC95% 1,8-27,7), encamamiento (4,6 IC95% 1,1-20,9) y la Neumonía Asociada a Cuidados Sanitarios (NACS) (4,6 IC95% 1,3-16,5). El tratamiento en primera línea con ertapenem fue un factor protector independiente en este grupo de pacientes (0,1 IC95% 0,1-0,7). Conclusiones. El tratamiento con ertapenem se asoció a una respuesta clínica superior en el paciente anciano frágil con NAC complicada y se podría considerar como un régimen terapéutico de primera línea en este contexto (AU)